← Voltar para a lista de provas Comando da Aeronáutica — Escola de Especialistas de Aeronáutica · Curso de Formação de Sargentos da Aeronáutica (CFS 1/2025) — Opção 01 96 questões nesta prova · página 5 de 5 · 96 com gabarito Gabarito disponível 'Learner' é quem aprende: aluno/estudante. O sufixo -er forma o agente da ação: learner é quem aprende (learn + er). O sinônimo mais próximo é student. B (teaching = ensino) e C (knowledge = conhecimento) não designam uma pessoa. D (acquisition = aquisição) nomeia um processo, e não quem o realiza. Referência: Vocabulário: formação de agentivos com o sufixo -er. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível Paráfrase de 'It's never too late to become a good language learner'. A frase significa que, em qualquer momento da vida, mesmo depois de dificuldades anteriores, é possível tornar-se um bom aprendiz. A alternativa A exprime essa ideia. B afirma que o processo piora com o tempo, o que o texto não diz. C sugere que há idade limite para aprender, o contrário da frase. D fala em ensinar bons aprendizes, e não em tornar-se um bom aprendiz. Referência: British Council LearnEnglish – Study skills tips (A2 reading). Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível Verdadeiro/falso sobre o texto de Altman: globalização como tema em debate há duas décadas. A 1ª é verdadeira: o texto diz que 'duas décadas' se passaram desde que a palavra passou a aparecer nas discussões de negócios e economia, e que o debate sobre ser algo bom ou ruim existiu. A 3ª é verdadeira: um dos lados defendia que a expansão das corporações para o mundo em desenvolvimento era a melhor esperança de elevar o padrão de vida. A 2ª e a 4ª são falsas. A sequência correta é T-F-T-F. B, C e D marcam como verdadeira a 2ª (ou a 4ª) e como falsa a 1ª ou a 3ª, o que contraria o texto. A 2ª é falsa porque as empresas ocidentais competiam com importações mais baratas vindas da Ásia, e não eram elas que as traziam. A 4ª é falsa porque a complexidade surgiu 'later on', e não na virada do milênio. Referência: Altman, D. Managing globalization (in Sharma, Reading the News, Thomson ELT, 2007). Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível 'Whether' (se, indireto) pode ser substituído por 'if'. 'Whether' introduz uma oração subordinada indireta com sentido de 'se'. 'If' pode ocupar essa posição em 'talk if globalization was...'. A) Errada: 'where' indica lugar. B) Errada: 'since' indica tempo ou causa. C) Errada: 'but' indica contraste e não faz sentido. D) Correta. Referência: Whether / if em discurso indireto. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível A lacuna pede 'companies', em oposição a 'Western companies'. O trecho contrasta empresas ocidentais que competiam com importados asiáticos com empresas asiáticas que passam a projetar e montar produtos no Ocidente. Logo, 'companies' completa o texto. B) Errada: 'stores' (lojas) não projetam nem montam produtos. C) Errada: 'workers' não encaixa no contraste com 'Western companies'. D) Errada: mercados não projetam produtos. A) Correta. Referência: Vocabulário em contexto. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível A ideia central é que a globalização, boa ou ruim, é inevitável. O texto apresenta o debate sobre a globalização ser boa ou ruim e conclui que, seja como for, ela é inevitável ('an Unavoidable Thing'). A) Errada: mostra só um dos lados. B) Errada: mostra só o outro lado. C) Errada: o texto fala de duas décadas atrás, não de algo que começou agora. D) Correta. Referência: Interpretação de texto: ideia principal. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível 'You'd' (condicional) = 'you would'. Na oração condicional 'if you read more, you'd have...', 'you'd' é a contração de 'you would'. A alternativa A apenas desfaz a contração e preserva o sentido. B) Errada: 'should' muda o sentido para conselho. C) Errada: 'could' muda para possibilidade ou capacidade. D) Errada: 'had have' é gramaticalmente incorreto. A) Correta. Referência: Contração 'd = would; segundo condicional. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível 'Gamut' = a gama completa de possibilidades. 'The whole gamut of human potential' significa toda a gama do potencial humano. A definição de 'gamut' é 'the complete range of possibilities'. A) Errada: define 'opinion'. B) Errada: define 'experience'. C) Errada: define 'approach' ou 'method'. D) Correta. Referência: Vocabulário em contexto. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível O antônimo de 'better' entre as opções é 'worse'. 'Better' é o comparativo de 'good', e seu oposto no comparativo é 'worse' (comparativo de 'bad'). A) Errada: 'bet' é aposta. B) Errada: 'bad' está no grau positivo. C) Errada: 'worst' é superlativo. D) Correta. Referência: Comparativos irregulares. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível Pergunta sobre duração de tempo: 'How long'. A resposta, 'an hour a day', indica duração de tempo, e 'How long do you spend online?' pergunta isso. A) Errada: 'how much' pergunta quantidade ou preço de incontáveis. B) Errada: 'how many' pergunta quantidade de contáveis. D) Errada: 'how far' pergunta distância. C) Correta. Referência: Wh-questions. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível 'Rather than' equivale a 'instead of'. 'Rather than' significa 'em vez de'. Na frase, as diferenças são culturais em vez de individuais, e 'instead of' tem o mesmo sentido. A, B e D (as a consequence of, because of, due to) expressam causa, o que não é o caso aqui. C) Correta. Referência: Linking words: contraste e substituição. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível A alternativa B usa o Present Perfect ('has long been'). A frase original usa 'has brought' (have/has + particípio). Em 'Massage has long been a popular method', há 'has' + 'been', também Present Perfect. A) Errada: 'had a chance' é Simple Past. C) Errada: 'has' é verbo principal (possuir) no presente simples. D) Errada: 'Did you have' é Simple Past. B) Correta. Referência: Present Perfect. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível Present Continuous com valor de futuro planejado. 'I'm meeting my parents on Sunday' usa o presente contínuo para um compromisso futuro já combinado. Ou seja, o evento ainda vai acontecer. A) Errada: o encontro é futuro, não agora. C) Errada: não se refere ao domingo passado. D) Errada: o encontro é no domingo, não no sábado. B) Correta. Referência: Present Continuous com valor de futuro. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível 'Can' como possibilidade/permissão pode ser trocado por 'may'. Em 'how long we can be late without being impolite', 'can' indica o que é permitido ou possível. 'May' expressa essa mesma ideia de permissão ou possibilidade. A) Errada: 'have to' indica obrigação. B) Errada: 'ought to' indica recomendação ou dever. C) Errada: 'must' indica obrigação forte. D) Correta. Referência: Verbos modais: can/may. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível A paráfrase fiel diz que uma cultura mais rica reconhece e inclui as diferentes potencialidades. O trecho diz que, para uma cultura mais rica, é preciso reconhecer toda a gama de potenciais humanos e dar lugar a cada dom. A alternativa A resume isso. B) Errada: inverte a ideia, pois exige que as pessoas se encaixem, e não que a cultura as acolha. C) Errada: o texto valoriza os contrastes. D) Errada: toma a metáfora do tecido ao pé da letra e omite a ideia de reconhecer os dons. A) Correta. Referência: Interpretação de texto: paráfrase. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos. Gabarito disponível Antônimos plausíveis: huge → tiny; positive → negative. 'Huge' (enorme) tem como antônimo 'tiny' (minúsculo), e 'positive' tem como antônimo 'negative'. Só a alternativa B traz ambos. A) Errada: 'big' e 'good' são sinônimos ou semelhantes. C) Errada: 'great' é sinônimo de 'huge'. D) Errada: 'enormous' é sinônimo de 'huge'. B) Correta. Referência: Vocabulário: antônimos. Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos.EEAR — Exame de Admissão ao CFS 1/2025 — Opção 01 — Português, Matemática, Física e Inglês — Código 62
Many studies about language learning ask the question: What makes a good language learner?
There are some things that good language learners do and some things they don’t do. Here are some of the most useful suggestions from studies:
• Don’t be afraid of making mistakes. People often get things wrong. Good language learners notice their mistakes and learn from them.
• Do group activities. People use language to communicate with other people. A good language learner always looks for opportunities to talk with other students.
• Make notes during every class. Notes help you to remember new language. Look at your notes when you do your homework.
• Use a dictionary. Good language learners often use dictionaries to check the meaning of words they don’t know. They also make their own vocabulary lists.
• Think in the language you’re learning outside the classroom. When you’re shopping or walking down the street, remember useful words and phrases. Sometimes, when you’re at home, say new words to practise your pronunciation.
• Do extra practice. Test and improve your language, reading and listening skills with self-study material. You can find a lot of this online.
• Imagine yourself speaking in the language. Many good language learners can see and hear themselves speaking in the language. This helps their motivation.
• Enjoy the process. Good language learners have fun with the language. Watch a TV series or film, listen to songs, play video games or read a book. It’s never too late to become a good language learner.
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/skills/reading/a2-reading/study-skills-tips
The expression learner is closest in meaning toResolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Many studies about language learning ask the question: What makes a good language learner?
There are some things that good language learners do and some things they don’t do. Here are some of the most useful suggestions from studies:
• Don’t be afraid of making mistakes. People often get things wrong. Good language learners notice their mistakes and learn from them.
• Do group activities. People use language to communicate with other people. A good language learner always looks for opportunities to talk with other students.
• Make notes during every class. Notes help you to remember new language. Look at your notes when you do your homework.
• Use a dictionary. Good language learners often use dictionaries to check the meaning of words they don’t know. They also make their own vocabulary lists.
• Think in the language you’re learning outside the classroom. When you’re shopping or walking down the street, remember useful words and phrases. Sometimes, when you’re at home, say new words to practise your pronunciation.
• Do extra practice. Test and improve your language, reading and listening skills with self-study material. You can find a lot of this online.
• Imagine yourself speaking in the language. Many good language learners can see and hear themselves speaking in the language. This helps their motivation.
• Enjoy the process. Good language learners have fun with the language. Watch a TV series or film, listen to songs, play video games or read a book. It’s never too late to become a good language learner.
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/skills/reading/a2-reading/study-skills-tips
Another way of saying “It’s never too late to become a good language learner” isResolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Managing globalization: if it’s here to stay, what do we know?
Daniel Altman
Two decades have passed since the word “globalization” started showing up with any frequency in discussions of business and economics. At first, the focus was on Western companies trying to compete with cheaper, sometimes better imports from Japan, South Korea, China and other countries. It was a straight fight: the battle lines were drawn along each country’s borders.
Later on, things become more complex. Asian __________ started designing and assembling products in the West. Western companies opened up new fronts by sending jobs abroad - not just in manufacturing but in service industries as well.
At the turn of the millennium, there was a lot of talk about whether globalization was a Good Thing or a Bad Thing. One side argued that it allowed big, multinational corporations to exploit workers in poor countries to pad their profit margins. The other side retorted that the expansion of these corporations into the developing world offered the best hope for raising living standards. One side complained that globalization was creating and destroying industries too quickly for the labor force to adjust. The other side answered that these shifts were rapidly improving the world’s ability to use its resources efficiently. Now, it’s pretty clear that globalization, be it good or bad, is an Unavoidable Thing (...)
Adapted from Sharma, Pete. Reading the News, Thomson ELT, 2007.
Write T for true and F for false, then choose the alternative with the right sequence.
According to the text, globalization
( ) has appeared in discussions involving business and economics for two decades and its a subject that people haven’t decided yet whether it is a good or a bad thing.
( ) was first focused on Western companies that brought cheaper products, better from those imported from Japan, South Korea, China and other countries.
( ) as a good thing, through the expansion of multinational corporations into the developing world, offered the best hope for rising living standards.
( ) at the turn of the millennium, became a more complex subject influenced by Asian and Western companies.Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Managing globalization: if it’s here to stay, what do we know?
Daniel Altman
Two decades have passed since the word “globalization” started showing up with any frequency in discussions of business and economics. At first, the focus was on Western companies trying to compete with cheaper, sometimes better imports from Japan, South Korea, China and other countries. It was a straight fight: the battle lines were drawn along each country’s borders.
Later on, things become more complex. Asian __________ started designing and assembling products in the West. Western companies opened up new fronts by sending jobs abroad - not just in manufacturing but in service industries as well.
At the turn of the millennium, there was a lot of talk about whether globalization was a Good Thing or a Bad Thing. One side argued that it allowed big, multinational corporations to exploit workers in poor countries to pad their profit margins. The other side retorted that the expansion of these corporations into the developing world offered the best hope for raising living standards. One side complained that globalization was creating and destroying industries too quickly for the labor force to adjust. The other side answered that these shifts were rapidly improving the world’s ability to use its resources efficiently. Now, it’s pretty clear that globalization, be it good or bad, is an Unavoidable Thing (...)
Adapted from Sharma, Pete. Reading the News, Thomson ELT, 2007.
The word whether, in bold in the text, is correctly replaced in the sentence.Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Managing globalization: if it’s here to stay, what do we know?
Daniel Altman
Two decades have passed since the word “globalization” started showing up with any frequency in discussions of business and economics. At first, the focus was on Western companies trying to compete with cheaper, sometimes better imports from Japan, South Korea, China and other countries. It was a straight fight: the battle lines were drawn along each country’s borders.
Later on, things become more complex. Asian __________ started designing and assembling products in the West. Western companies opened up new fronts by sending jobs abroad - not just in manufacturing but in service industries as well.
At the turn of the millennium, there was a lot of talk about whether globalization was a Good Thing or a Bad Thing. One side argued that it allowed big, multinational corporations to exploit workers in poor countries to pad their profit margins. The other side retorted that the expansion of these corporations into the developing world offered the best hope for raising living standards. One side complained that globalization was creating and destroying industries too quickly for the labor force to adjust. The other side answered that these shifts were rapidly improving the world’s ability to use its resources efficiently. Now, it’s pretty clear that globalization, be it good or bad, is an Unavoidable Thing (...)
Adapted from Sharma, Pete. Reading the News, Thomson ELT, 2007.
Choose the alternative that completes the text.Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Managing globalization: if it’s here to stay, what do we know?
Daniel Altman
Two decades have passed since the word “globalization” started showing up with any frequency in discussions of business and economics. At first, the focus was on Western companies trying to compete with cheaper, sometimes better imports from Japan, South Korea, China and other countries. It was a straight fight: the battle lines were drawn along each country’s borders.
Later on, things become more complex. Asian __________ started designing and assembling products in the West. Western companies opened up new fronts by sending jobs abroad - not just in manufacturing but in service industries as well.
At the turn of the millennium, there was a lot of talk about whether globalization was a Good Thing or a Bad Thing. One side argued that it allowed big, multinational corporations to exploit workers in poor countries to pad their profit margins. The other side retorted that the expansion of these corporations into the developing world offered the best hope for raising living standards. One side complained that globalization was creating and destroying industries too quickly for the labor force to adjust. The other side answered that these shifts were rapidly improving the world’s ability to use its resources efficiently. Now, it’s pretty clear that globalization, be it good or bad, is an Unavoidable Thing (...)
Adapted from Sharma, Pete. Reading the News, Thomson ELT, 2007.
Choose the sentence that correctly summarizes the text.Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
“If we are to achieve a richer culture, rich in contrasting values, we must recognize the whole gamut of human potential, and so weave a ... fabric... in which each diverse human gift will find a fitting place”.Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Resolução comentada
Análise das alternativas
Texto-base:
Texto-base:
Texto-base:
Texto-base:
Texto-base:
Texto-base:
Choose the correct alternative to replace the sentence “Maybe if you read more, you’d have a larger vocabulary”.
In the excerpt: “If we are to achieve a richer culture, rich in contrasting values, we must recognize the whole gamut of human potential...” The best definition to the word gamut, in bold, is:
Check the alternative that presents the antonym of better.
Considering the sentence: “__________ do you spend online? I usually spend an hour a day surfing the Internet and checking the e-mail”. Choose the best alternative to fill in the sentence.
In the sentence: “We tend to misinterpret other people’s behaviour, blame them, or judge their intentions or competence without realizing that we are experiencing cultural rather than individual differences”. The expression rather than could be correctly replaced by
The sentence: “Few would deny that technology has brought benefits to humanity in terms of better health, improved communications, and a better quality of life for millions” is an example of Present Perfect. Choose the alternative which follows the same grammar rule.
About the sentence “I’m meeting my parents on Sunday”, it is correct to affirm that
In the sentence “...how long we can be late without being impolite...” the modal verb can, in bold, can be correctly replaced by
Choose the correct alternative according to the excerpt:
Considering the excerpt: “Few would deny that technology has brought huge benefits to humanity. However, some experts claim that ill effects of our growing dependence on technology could actually outweigh the positive results”. Choose the alternative with possible antonyms of the adjectives “huge” and “positive”.