Questão 33 — Tempos Verbais (Língua Inglesa) — Serviço de Seleção do Pessoal da Marinha (SSPM) · Marinha do Brasil — Escola Naval 2024

Língua Inglesa Tempos Verbais

Serviço de Seleção do Pessoal da Marinha (SSPM) 2024 Médio

Marinha do Brasil — Escola Naval · Admissão à Escola Naval (CPAEN) · Caderno Amarela

Gabarito disponível

Which option completes the text below correctly?

My husband and I ______ at the airport last Thursday when we ______ that we ______ our passports at home. Fortunately, we ______ very early at the airport so we ______ time to go back home. We ______ our passports, ______ back to the airport and could finally ______ the plane.

Selecione uma alternativa A) checked in / had realized / were leaving / arrived / have had / get / hurry / gotten on B) was checking in / realized / had left / had arrived / have had / got / hurry / get on C) were checking in / realized / had left / had arrived / had / got / hurried / get on D) was checking in / had realized / left / arrived / had / gotten / had hurried / got on E) were checking in / had realized / left / arrived / had / gotten / hurried / got on

Resolução comentada

A sequência correta mistura passado contínuo, passado simples e past perfect.

'My husband and I' pede 'were checking in' (ação em andamento no passado), interrompida por 'realized' (passado simples). 'Had left' e 'had arrived' indicam ações anteriores a essa percepção, e 'had time' e 'got to' seguem o passado simples. Depois vêm 'hurried' (passado) e 'could finally get on' (infinitivo sem 'to' após o modal 'could').

Análise das alternativas

A) 'checked in' e 'have had' não se encaixam na sequência de tempos. B) 'was checking in' não concorda com o sujeito plural, e 'have had' e 'hurry' estão errados. D) 'was checking in' está errado, e 'had hurried' e 'got on' após 'could' também. E) 'had realized' e 'left' invertem a ordem dos fatos, e 'gotten' é forma inadequada.

Referência: Verb tenses: past continuous, simple past e past perfect.

Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos.