Gabarito disponível
Read the following extract and answer questions 41 and 42.
The disjunction between method as conceptualized by theorists and method as conducted by teachers is the direct consequence of the inherent limitations of the concept of method itself. First and foremost, methods are based on idealized concepts geared toward idealized contexts. Since language learning and teaching needs, wants, and situations are unpredictably numerous, no idealized method can visualize all the variables in advance in order to provide situation-specific suggestions that practicing teachers so clearly need in order to tackle the challenges they confront every day of their professional lives. As a predominantly top-down exercise, the conception and construction of methods have been largely guided by a one-size-fits-all (…) approach that assumes a common clientele with common goals.
(KUMARAVADIVELU, B. Beyond methods: macrostrategies for language teaching. Adapted)
Considering the excerpt above, it is fair to say that the writer argues for the
Resolução comentada
O autor defende a autonomia do professor para escolher e usar métodos, compreendendo as particularidades socioculturais e políticas.
O autor critica os métodos como idealizados, 'tamanho único' e de cima para baixo, incapazes de prever as situações específicas. Isso leva à defesa da autonomia docente, com o professor atento às particularidades de seu contexto.
Análise das alternativas
A) O texto não propõe combinar métodos, e sim ir além do conceito de método. B) Exercícios top-down são justamente criticados. C) Não defende eliminar métodos por serem uma perda de tempo. D) Não propõe atividades dissociadas de qualquer teoria.
Referência: KUMARAVADIVELU, B. Beyond methods: macrostrategies for language teaching.
Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos.