Gabarito disponível
Texto-base:
Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 47 a 52.
Since ChatGPT can engage in conversation and generate essays and graphs that closely resemble those created by humans, educators worry students may use it to cheat. The main reason students cheat is their academic motivation. Sometimes they are just motivated to get a high grade, whereas other times they wish to learn all that they can about a topic. The decision to cheat or not often relates to how academic assignments and tests are constructed and assessed, not on the availability of technological shortcuts.
Research demonstrates that students are more likely to cheat when assignments are designed in ways that encourage them to outperform their classmates. There is less cheating when teachers assign academic tasks that prompt them to work collaboratively and to focus on mastering content instead of getting a good grade.
An important way to boost students’ confidence is to provide them with opportunities to experience success. For example, suppose students are asked to attempt to design a hypothetical vehicle that can use gasoline more efficiently than a traditional car. Students who struggle with the project can use ChatGPT to break down the larger problem into smaller challenges or tasks. ChatGPT might suggest they first develop an overall concept for the vehicle before determining the size and weight of the vehicle and deciding what type of fuel will be used. Teachers could also ask students to compare the steps suggested by ChatGPT with steps that are recommended by other sources.
(Kui Xie e Eric M. Anderman. http://www.theconversation.com. 06.06.2023. Adaptado)
An English teacher believes this is a good text to give their more advanced students to read, since it is about a recent and polemic topic. A post-reading classroom discussion aimed at helping students critically react to the text’s content could include reflecting about
Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 47 a 52.
Since ChatGPT can engage in conversation and generate essays and graphs that closely resemble those created by humans, educators worry students may use it to cheat. The main reason students cheat is their academic motivation. Sometimes they are just motivated to get a high grade, whereas other times they wish to learn all that they can about a topic. The decision to cheat or not often relates to how academic assignments and tests are constructed and assessed, not on the availability of technological shortcuts.
Research demonstrates that students are more likely to cheat when assignments are designed in ways that encourage them to outperform their classmates. There is less cheating when teachers assign academic tasks that prompt them to work collaboratively and to focus on mastering content instead of getting a good grade.
An important way to boost students’ confidence is to provide them with opportunities to experience success. For example, suppose students are asked to attempt to design a hypothetical vehicle that can use gasoline more efficiently than a traditional car. Students who struggle with the project can use ChatGPT to break down the larger problem into smaller challenges or tasks. ChatGPT might suggest they first develop an overall concept for the vehicle before determining the size and weight of the vehicle and deciding what type of fuel will be used. Teachers could also ask students to compare the steps suggested by ChatGPT with steps that are recommended by other sources.
(Kui Xie e Eric M. Anderman. http://www.theconversation.com. 06.06.2023. Adaptado)
An English teacher believes this is a good text to give their more advanced students to read, since it is about a recent and polemic topic. A post-reading classroom discussion aimed at helping students critically react to the text’s content could include reflecting about
Resolução comentada
A discussão crítica pós-leitura deve relacionar o conteúdo à realidade brasileira.
Uma reação crítica ao conteúdo pede que os alunos relacionem as ideias do texto à sua realidade. Refletir se as preocupações com o uso de ChatGPT para trapacear também existem no contexto educacional brasileiro (C) faz isso, ao contrário das demais opções, que tratam de leitura ou de língua.
Análise das alternativas
A) Foca estratégias de leitura, não reação ao conteúdo. B) Questiona a fonte, mas não discute o conteúdo. D) Trata do gênero textual e da compreensão. E) Trata de dificuldades linguísticas, não de reação crítica.
Referência: Ensino de leitura crítica em língua estrangeira.
Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos.