Gabarito disponível
Read this paragraph.
"Innovative" IBM Kills Working from Home
If you would list the reasons why IBM's growth isn't what management wants it to be, geographic dispersal probably wouldn't be in the top ten. WFH only works if you can actually assess on an ongoing basis what work is getting done, but then again that's true for in-office work as well. Lazy managers assume work is getting done if you're in the office, just as delusional ones assume everyone works productively and independently if they are remote. But if the actual performance goes down due to lower motivation and wasted time, then it is a problem.
(Adapted from https: / / www. linkedin .com / pulse)
Which option contains a sentence with INCORRECT grammar?
"Innovative" IBM Kills Working from Home
If you would list the reasons why IBM's growth isn't what management wants it to be, geographic dispersal probably wouldn't be in the top ten. WFH only works if you can actually assess on an ongoing basis what work is getting done, but then again that's true for in-office work as well. Lazy managers assume work is getting done if you're in the office, just as delusional ones assume everyone works productively and independently if they are remote. But if the actual performance goes down due to lower motivation and wasted time, then it is a problem.
(Adapted from https: / / www. linkedin .com / pulse)
Which option contains a sentence with INCORRECT grammar?
Resolução comentada
A frase incorreta é a A, pois 'would' não aparece na oração com if.
Na condicional do tipo 2, a oração com 'if' usa o passado simples ('If you listed...'), e só a oração principal leva 'would'. 'If you would list' é gramaticalmente inadequado nesse uso.
Análise das alternativas
B, C, D e E usam o presente simples depois de 'if', em condicionais do tipo 0 ou 1, o que é correto.
Referência: Conditional sentences.
Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos.