Gabarito disponível
Texto-base:
When conducting a survey on the use of technology in the legislative process, one of the questions I asked was “Has the legislature, as an institution or in part, resisted technology based changes?” I asked this question based on my own experience with the Massachusetts Legislature. I spent 9 years working with legislators and senior staff, and the way they sometimes approached technology was at times comical―at times frightening. My friends and I watched on―and laughed―the first time a laptop computer or an iPhone made its way onto the floor of the Massachusetts House or Senate and the members gathered around it, acting as though they were looking at an artifact that had been dropped from Mars. I also saw an older legislative drafter become befuddled and angry when he was forced to start using the “track changes” and “comment” functions on Microsoft Word rather than marking up a bill with his beloved red pencil.
Sean J. Kealy. Technology & Legislative Drafting In The United States. Internet: <sites.bu.edu> (adapted).
Judge the following items concerning the previous text.
In his text, the author shows his skepticism about the use of technology in the legislative process.
When conducting a survey on the use of technology in the legislative process, one of the questions I asked was “Has the legislature, as an institution or in part, resisted technology based changes?” I asked this question based on my own experience with the Massachusetts Legislature. I spent 9 years working with legislators and senior staff, and the way they sometimes approached technology was at times comical―at times frightening. My friends and I watched on―and laughed―the first time a laptop computer or an iPhone made its way onto the floor of the Massachusetts House or Senate and the members gathered around it, acting as though they were looking at an artifact that had been dropped from Mars. I also saw an older legislative drafter become befuddled and angry when he was forced to start using the “track changes” and “comment” functions on Microsoft Word rather than marking up a bill with his beloved red pencil.
Sean J. Kealy. Technology & Legislative Drafting In The United States. Internet: <sites.bu.edu> (adapted).
Judge the following items concerning the previous text.
In his text, the author shows his skepticism about the use of technology in the legislative process.
Resolução comentada
O autor não demonstra ceticismo; relata situações cômicas/assustadoras de resistência alheia.
O autor descreve a resistência de legisladores à tecnologia, tratando-a com humor e preocupação. Isso não indica ceticismo dele próprio quanto ao uso de tecnologia no processo legislativo; o ceticismo, se há, é dos legisladores.
Análise das alternativas
Certo: atribui ao autor a posição que o texto atribui aos legisladores. Errado: correto, o texto não revela ceticismo do autor.
Referência: Interpretação de texto (Cebraspe)
Resolução comentada do VaiConcursos.